Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-6218837-20150310023643/@comment-24133975-20150312011432

SilverHexxitFights wrote: To be perfectly honest, I think that's a great idea, the way you put it above. The problem being how much stricter is it possible to get without a full-scale rebellion on our hands? I may be exaggerating a little here, but I'd say people are unhappy enough. I think that if we're completely fair about it, people won't have a reason to complain about the strictness. From the looks of it, the system I proposed above seems completely fair. It offers a user a ton of advice on how to improve their article, and if they, for some reason, refuse to take the advice, then their article will be deleted. They were given a fair chance to change the article up, but they declined or ignored it knowing the consequences. It's their bag, not ours.